- #Bouncing balls game online free that eat each other full
- #Bouncing balls game online free that eat each other series
But Jolley and his peers did not just protect the ball player, they protected - and preserved - a particular form of the game. Does anyone seriously believe the same standard of player protection was brought to that game as to the classic of 26 years earlier?Īpologists for today's relentless defensive, stoppage-oriented football argue that, in the past, too many inconsequential free kicks were paid. In the 1996 grand final, 19 free kicks - about one every six minutes - were awarded. In this year's grand final, 31 free kicks (not including ''out on the full'') were awarded in a game with indubitably more tackling than was the case 42 years ago. In 1970, Jolley paid 90 (which may include frees for out of bounds on the full).
#Bouncing balls game online free that eat each other full
While I can't immediately verify this astonishing claim because that figure is not recorded (and currently I don't have time to view the full replay), I accept that the number of ball-ups was many times lower than this year's 51.Īnd what was also dramatically different was the number of free kicks. The late Don Jolley, who umpired the fabled 1970 grand final, once told me he bounced the ball six times around the ground that day. But there is more to it than this, and it is time for the AFL to confront it. The dramatic growth in ball-ups has coincided with the exponential increase in interchange rotations and, no doubt, there is a connection between the ability of players to keep running to contests and the numbers that converge around the ball.
Over 10 years until 2008, the average number of field bounces in season deciders was 27 in the past four years, it has risen to 47. Grand finals are the indicator of trends. The problem is packs, and endless ball-ups. If the proof of the pudding is in the eating, the current house special is a gelatinous blob that keeps sticking to one part of the plate. Either the laws were always fundamentally deficient or the AFL is failing to ensure their implementation so as to maintain a healthy equilibrium. The league is a little like the sports drug testers, constantly playing catch-up but without the excuse of having teams of scientists in far-flung laboratories plotting against them.Īnd while it claims to simply be providing considered responses to a changing game, few other sports have the need to keep re-jigging their rules like this one. The sort of dog-chasing-its-tail announcement on rule changes, delivered by Andrew Demetriou and Adrian Anderson last Tuesday, stands as evidence. Yet it is arguable the AFL has failed, over many years, to adequately manage what happens on the footy ground.
#Bouncing balls game online free that eat each other series
THE AFL has a lot to be proud of: a ground-breaking administrative model evolution from a series of local competitions to a position of national pre-eminence lucrative television deals and use of its profile to powerful effect on some social issues.Ī sports administration that has fared this well, you would assume, would be a particular master of its essential product: the game.
0 kommentar(er)
